Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of special routes in Michigan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 07:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- List of special routes in Michigan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was tagged for G7, but looking at the number of minor contributions by other authors over the past three years, I do not believe G7 applies unambiguously. Referring to AfD for discussion, I am Neutral Jclemens (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It doesn't seem to be important enough for Wikipedia. Endofskull (talk) 23:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The information was merged into other lists and articles. –Fredddie™ 00:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the major creator requested deletion. Information has been merged elsewhere. Admrboltz (talk) 02:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Information is now elsewhere. Dough4872 04:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the major creator requesting deletion. There are now tables in the Interstate, US and State Highway lists to hold the special routes of those types of state highway in Michigan in an expanded format. This list is now redundant and obsolete. Imzadi 1979 → 05:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Redundant and main author supports deletion (see above). /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:34, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.